- Aiken, C., Fairbrother, J. T., & Post, P. G. (2012). The effects of self-controlled video feedback on the basketball set shot. Front. Movement Science Sport Psychology, 3; Pp: 338.
- Amorose, A. J., & Horn, T. S. (2000). Intrinsic motivation relationships with collegiate athletes gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22; Pp: 63-84.
- Ávila, L. T. G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 13; Pp: 849–853
- Badami, R., Kohestani,S., & Taghian, F. (2011 b). Feedback on more accurate trials enhances learning of sport skills. World Applied Sciences Journal, 133; Pp: 537-540. In Persian.
- Badami, R., Vaez Mousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83; Pp: 196-203.
- Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60; Pp: 941–951. In Persian. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78; Pp: 40-47.
- Chiviacowsky, S., Godinho, M., & Tani, G. (2005). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Effects of different schedules and task complexity. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 49(4); Pp: 277-296.
- Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Machado, C., & Rydberg, N. (2012). Self-controlled feedback enhances learning in adults with down syndrome. Rev Bras Fisioter, São Carlos, 16(3); Pp: 191-196.
- Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009). Knowledge of results after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80; Pp: 663-668.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M .(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
- Fairbrother, J., Laughlin, D., & Nguyen, T. (2012). Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Front. Movement Science Sport Psychology, 3; Pp: 338.
- Foll, D. L., Rascle, o., & Higgins, n. c. (2008). Attributional feedback-induced changes in functional and dysfunctional attributions, expectations of success, hopefulness, and short-term persistence in a novel sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 9(2); Pp: 77-101.
- Hollembeak, J., & Amorose, A. J. ( 2005). Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes intrinsic. motivation: a test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17; Pp: 20-36 .
- Hutchinson, J. C., Sherman, T., Martinovic, N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007). The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 20; Pp: 457-472.
- Inoue, N. (2007). Why face a challenge? The reason behind intrinsically motivated students spontaneous choice of challenging tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 17; Pp: 251-259.
- Johnson, D. S., Turban, D. B., Pieper K. F., & Ng, Y. M. (1996). Exploring the role of normative‐and performance‐based feedback in motivational processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26; Pp: 973 – 992.
- Kerr, J. H., Fujiyama, H., Wilson, G. V., & Nakamori, K. (2006). The experience of a modern dance group: Arousal, motivation, and self-rated performance. Research in Dance Education. 7(2); Pp: 125-140.
- Koka, A., & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teachers’ feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 4; Pp: 333-346.
- Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1; Pp: 1-12.
- Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: Evidence for a motivational model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30; Pp: 240-268.
- Nicaise, V., Bois, J. E., Fairclough, S. J., Amorose, A. J., & Cogerino, G. (2007). Girls and boys perceptions of physical education teachers feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. Journal of Sports Sciences. 25(8); Pp: 915-926.
- Saemi, E., Porter, J. M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 13; Pp: 378-382. In Persian.
- Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience (Pp: 59-75). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor learning and learning: A behavioral emphasis. (5th ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2002). Performance goals: The moderating roles of context and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6); Pp: 603-610.
- Stoate, I., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. Journal of Sport sciences. Pp: 1-9.
- Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1984 ). On the casual effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology. 6; Pp: 94 - 102.
- Viciana, J., Cervello, E. M., & Ramirez-lechuga, J. (2007). Effect of manipulating positive and negative feedback on goal orientations, perceived motivational climate, satisfaction, task choice, perception of ability, and attitude toward physical education lessons. Perceptual and motor skills, 105(1); Pp: 67.
- Weiss, M. R, & Ferrercaja, E. (2002). Motivation orientation and sport behavior. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (Pp: 101-184). (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- West, R. L., Bagwell, D. K., & Dark-Freudeman, A. (2005 ). Memory and goal setting: The response of older and younger adults to positive and objective feedback. Psychology and Aging, 20; Pp: 195-201.
- Wulf, G. (2014). Motor learning and control: Changing our view of motor learners: From information processors to human beings. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36; Pp: 1-5. Human Kinetics, Inc.
- Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. William & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice (Pp: 121-144). London: Routledge.
- Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 81; Pp: 425-431.
- Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology & Aging. 27; pP: 14-21.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self – regulation: A social cognitive perspecitive. In M, Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self regulation (Pp: 13-55). Sam Diego, CA: Academic Press.
|