- Sanli EA, Patterson JT, Bray SR, Lee TD. Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in psychology. 2013;3:611.
- Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2016;23:1382-414.
- Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG, Tennant LK, Cauraugh JH. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1997;68(4):269-79.
- Janelle CM, Kim J, Singer RN. Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and motor skills. 1995;81(2):627-34.
- Post PG, Fairbrother JT, Barros JA. Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2011;82(3):474-81.
- Marques P, Walter C, Tani G, Corrêa U. The effect of self-goal setting on the acquisition of a motor skill. Motricidade. 2014;10(4):56-63.
- Andrieux M, Danna J, Thon B. Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2012;83(1):27-35.
- Patterson JT, Carter M. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human movement science. 2010;29(2):214-27.
- Lim S, Ali A, Kim W, Kim J, Choi S, Radlo SJ. Influence of self-controlled feedback on learning a serial motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2015;120(2):462-74.
- Huet M, Camachon C, Fernandez L, Jacobs DM, Montagne G. Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention towards perceptual invariants. Human Movement Science. 2009;28(4):450-67.
- An J, Lewthwaite R, Lee S, Wulf G. Choice of practice-task order enhances golf skill learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2020;50:101737.
- Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH, Whitacre CA. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2001;72(3):299-303.
- Lemos A, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Chiviacowsky S. Autonomy support enhances performance expectancies, positive affect, and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2017;31:28-34.
- Wu WF, Magill RA. Allowing learners to choose: self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2011;82(3):449-57.
- Lessa HT, Chiviacowsky S. Self-controlled practice benefits motor learning in older adults. Human movement science. 2015;40:372-80.
- Brydges R, Carnahan H, Rose D, Rose L, Dubrowski A. Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximize educational benefit. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(5):806-12.
- Chiviacowsky S, de Medeiros FL, Kaefer A, Wally R, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2008;79(1):122-7.
- Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(2):96-101.
- Carter MJ, Ste-Marie DM. Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2017;24:1879-88.
- Wulf G, Iwatsuki T, Machin B, Kellogg J, Copeland C, Lewthwaite R. Lassoing skill through learner choice. Journal of motor behavior. 2018;50(3):285-92.
- Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Self-controlled learning: the importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in psychology. 2012;3:458.
- Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2002;73(4):408-15.
- Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2005;76(1):42-8.
- Carter M, Rathwell S, Ste-Marie D. Motor skill retention is modulated by strategy choice during self-controlled knowledge of results schedules. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2016;4(1):100-15.
- Carter MJ, Carlsen AN, Ste-Marie DM. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: A replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5:1325.
- Laughlin DD, Fairbrother JT, Wrisberg CA, Alami A, Fisher LA, Huck SW. Self-control behaviors during the learning of a cascade juggling task. Human Movement Science. 2015;41:9-19.
- Pathania A, Leiker AM, Euler M, Miller MW, Lohse KR. Challenge, motivation, and effort: Neural and behavioral correlates of self-control of difficulty during practice. Biological Psychology. 2019;141:52-63.
- Barros JA, Yantha ZD, Carter MJ, Hussien J, Ste-Marie DM. Examining the impact of error estimation on the effects of self-controlled feedback. Human movement science. 2019;63:182-98.
- Grand KF, Bruzi AT, Dyke FB, Godwin MM, Leiker AM, Thompson AG, et al. Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation. Human Movement Science. 2015;43:23-32.
- Lewthwaite R, Chiviacowsky S, Drews R, Wulf G. Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2015;22:1383-8.
- Abdollahipour R, Nieto MP, Psotta R, Wulf G. External focus of attention and autonomy support have additive benefits for motor performance in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2017;32:17-24.
- Chua L-K, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance. Human Movement Science. 2018;60:107-14.
- Halperin I, Chapman DW, Martin DT, Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Choices enhance punching performance of competitive kickboxers. Psychological research. 2017;81:1051-8.
- Iwatsuki T, Navalta JW, Wulf G. Autonomy enhances running efficiency. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019;37(6):685-91.
- Wulf G, Chiviacowsky S, Cardozo PL. Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human movement science. 2014;37:
12-20.
- Couvillion KF, Bass AD, Fairbrother JT. Increased cognitive load during acquisition of a continuous task eliminates the learning effects of self-controlled knowledge of results. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2020;38(1):94-9.
- Woodard KF, Fairbrother JT. Cognitive loading during and after continuous task execution alters the effects of self-controlled knowledge of results. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:1046.
- Carter MJ, Patterson JT. Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science. 2012;31(6):1459-72.
- Post PG, Fairbrother JT, Barros JA, Kulpa J. Self-controlled practice within a fixed time period facilitates the learning of a basketball set shot. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2014;2(1):9-15.
- Post PG, Aiken CA, Laughlin DD, Fairbrother JT. Self-control over combined video feedback and modeling facilitates motor learning. Human movement science. 2016;47:49-59.
- Souissi MA, Souissi H, Elghoul Y, Masmoudi L, Trabelsi O, Ammar A, et al. Information processing and technical knowledge contribute to self-controlled video feedback for children learning the snatch movement in weightlifting. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2021;128(4):1785-805.
- Iwatsuki T, Abdollahipour R, Psotta R, Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Autonomy facilitates repeated maximum force productions. Human movement science. 2017;55:264-8.
- Wulf G, Adams N. Small choices can enhance balance learning. Human Movement Science. 2014;38:235-40.
- Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis: Human kinetics; 2018.
- Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R. Consolidation of motor memory. Trends in neurosciences. 2006;29(1):58-64.
- Robertson EM, Cohen DA. Understanding consolidation through the architecture of memories. The Neuroscientist. 2006;12(3):261-71.
- Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A, Miall RC. Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2004;5(7):576-82.
- McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1989;60(1):48-58.
- O'Brien HL, Toms EG. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology. 2008;59(6):938-55.
- Leiker AM, Pathania A, Miller MW, Lohse KR. Exploring the neurophysiological effects of self-controlled practice in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2019;7(1):13-34.
- O'Brien HL, Toms EG. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;61(1):50-69.
- Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale, 3rd edn San Antonio. TX: The Psychological Corporation[Google Scholar]. 1997.
- Fried LP, Kronmal RA, Newman AB, Bild DE, Mittelmark MB, Polak JF, et al. Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Jama. 1998;279(8):585-92.
- Benedict RH, DeLuca J, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R, et al. Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2017;23(5):721-33.
- Hooyman A, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science. 2014;36:190-8.
- Lou HC, Skewes JC, Thomsen KR, Overgaard M, Lau HC, Mouridsen K, et al. Dopaminergic stimulation enhances confidence and accuracy in seeing rapidly presented words. Journal of vision. 2011;11(2):15-.
- Murayama K, Izuma K, Aoki R, Matsumoto K. “Your Choice” motivates you in the brain: the emergence of autonomy neuroscience. Recent developments in neuroscience research on human motivation. 2016;19:95-125.
- Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of experimental psychology. 1954;47(6):381.
|