اثر محتوای بازخورد افزوده بر اکتساب، یادداری، انتقال مهارت حرکتی و انگیزش درونی در کودکان و نوجوانان: ادراک- عمل متمایز در افراد مبتدی و ماهر

1.    Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis: Human kinetics Champaign, IL; 2011.

2.     Mouratidis A, Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Sideridis G. The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: Evidence for a motivational model. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;30(2):240-68.

3.     Clark S, Ste-Marie D. Self as a model: psychological and physical performance benefits. J Sports Sci. 2007;25:577-86.

4.     Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. ‎Front Psychol. 2012;3:458

5.     Saemi E, Wulf G, Varzaneh AG, Zarghami M. Feedback after good versus poor trials enhances motor learning in children. Rev bras educ fís esporte. 2011;25(4):673-81.

6.     Badami R, VaezMousavi M, Wulf G, Namazizadeh M. Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(2):360-4.

7.     Ávila LT, Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012; 13(6):849-53.

8.     Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016;23(5):1382-414.

9.     Dweck C. Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. 1999. Hove: Psychology Press; 1999.

10.  Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Motor learning through a motivational lens. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. 2012:173-92.

11.  Cimpian A, Arce H-MC, Markman EM, Dweck CS. Subtle linguistic cues affect children's motivation. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(4):314-6.

12.  Chiviacowsky S, Drews R. Effects of generic versus non-generic feedback on motor learning in children. PloS One. 2014;9(2):e88989.

13.  Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Conceptions of ability affect motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2009;41(5):461-7.

14.  Drews R, Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Children’s motor skill learning is influenced by their conceptions of ability. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2013;1(2):38-44.

15.  Dweck CS. The development of ability conceptions. Development of achievement motivation. 2002;17:57-88.

16.  Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68-78.

17.  Li W, Lee AM, Solmon MA. Effects of ability conceptions and intrinsic motivation on persistence and performance: An interaction approach. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005; 76(suppl. 1):A81.

18.  Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182-5.

19.  Leotti LA, Delgado MR. The inherent reward of choice. ‎Psychol Sci. 2011;22(10):1310-8.

20.  Eitam B, Kennedy PM, Higgins ET. Motivation from control. . Exp Brain Res. 2013;229(3):475-84.

21.  Gibson J. The theory of affordances The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception Boston: Houghton Miffin; 1979.

22.  Witt JK. Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011;20(3):201-6.

23.  Witt JK, Proffitt DR. See the ball, hit the ball apparent ball size is correlated with batting average. Psychol Sci. 2005;16(12):937-8.

24.  Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W. Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception. 2004;33(5):577-90.

25.  Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Bakdash JZ, Proffitt DR. Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008;15(3):581-5.

26.  Taylor JET, Witt JK, Sugovic M. When walls are no longer barriers: Perception of wall height in parkour. Perception. 2011;40(6):757-60.

27.  Witt JK, Sugovic M. Performance and ease influence perceived speed. Perception. 2010;39(10):1341-53.

28.  Kashi A, Shirvaniha Z. Consideration to different view of abilities: The effect of generic versus non-generic feedback on motor learning of mentally disabled children. Mot Behav. 2016;23:15-23. (In Persian).

29.  Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191-215.

30.  Schultz W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2000;1(3):199-207.

31.  Rosenqvist O, Skans ON. Confidence enhanced performance?–The causal effects of success on future performance in professional golf tournaments. J Econ Behav Organ. 2015;117:281-95.

32.  Montes J, Wulf G, Navalta J. Maximal aerobic capacity can be increased by enhancing performers' expectancies. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018;58(5):744-9

33.  Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. 1998; p 340.

34.  Adcock RA, Thangavel A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Knutson B, Gabrieli JD. Reward-motivated learning: Mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron. 2006;50(3):507-17.

35.  Gray R. Being selective at the plate: Processing dependence between perceptual variables relates to hitting goals and performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013;39(4):1124-42.

36.  Witt JK, Schuck DM, Taylor JET. Action-specific effects underwater. Perception. 2011;40(5):530-7.

37.  Lee Y, Lee S, Carello C, Turvey M. An archer's perceived form scales the “hitableness” of archery targets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(5):1125-31.

38.  Cañal-Bruland R, van der Kamp J. Action goals influence action-specific perception. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;16(6):1100-5.

39.  Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Wickens C. Action-specific effects in perception and their potential applications. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2016;5(1):69-76.

40.  Witt JK, Dorsch TE. Kicking to bigger uprights: Field goal kicking performance influences perceived size. Perception. 2009;38(9):1328-40.

41. Nicaise V, Bois JE, Fairclough SJ, Amorose AJ, Cogérino G. Girls' and boys' perceptions of physical education teachers' feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. J Sports Sci. 2007; 25(8):915-26.