تأثیر اطلاعات افزودة ویدئویی انتخابی و اجباری بر یادگیری حرکتی شوت جفت بسکتبال: با تأکید بر نظریة نقطه چالش

1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
2. McCullagh P, Weiss MR. Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In: R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, C. M. Janelle, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. New York: 2001; p. 205-38.
3. Buchanan JJ, Dean NJ. Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice. Psychol Res. 2010; 74(3):313-26.
4. Rohbanfard H, Proteau L. Learning through observation: A combination of expert and novice models favors learning. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 215(3-4):183-97.
5. Sheffield FD. Theoretical considerations in the learning of complex sequential tasks from demonstrations and practice. In: Lumsdaine AA, editor. Student response in programmed instruction. Washington: National Research Council; 1961. p. 13-32.
6. Vogt S, Thomaschke R. From visuo-motor interactions to imitation learning: Behavioural and brain imaging studies. J Sports Sci. 2007 Mar; 25 (5):497-517.
7. Feltz D L, Landers D M, Raeder U. Enhancing self‐efficacy in high avoidance motor tasks: A comparison of modeling techniques. J Sport Psychol. 1979; 1: 112‐22.
8. Maleki F, Shafinia P, Zarghami, M, Neisi A. The comparison of different types of observational training on motor learning of ggymnastic handstand. J HUM KINET: 2010;26:13‐9.
9. Maslovat D, Hodges N J, Krigolson O E, Handy T C. (2010). Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill. Exp Brain Res. 2010;204(1):119-30.
10. Hayes S J, Ashford D, Bennett S J. Goal-directed imitation: the means to an end. Acta Psychologica. 2008;127(2):407-15.
11. Maleki F, Shafinia P, Zarghami, M, Kousari S. The comparison of three different educational methods through observation on acquisition and retention of motor skill. Motor behavior and sports psychology. 2010;7:31‐44. (In Persian).
12. Holmes P, Calmels C. A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. J Mot Behav. 2008;40(5):433-45.
13. Shea C H, Wright, D L, Wulf G, Whitacre C. Physical and observational practices afford unique learning opportunities. J Mot Behav. 2000;32(1):27-36.
14. Lago-Rodríguez A, Cheeran B, Koch G, Hortobágyi T, Fernandezdel-Olmo M. The role of mirror neurons in observational motor learning: An integrative review. Eur. J. Hum. Mov. 2014;32:82-103.
15. Maleki F, Shafinia P, Zarghami, M, Ostovan Z. The influence various types of observation based teaching on cognitive learning handstand skill. Research on sports management and motor behavior. 2012;16(8):89‐106. (In Persian).
16. Fagundes J, Chen DD, Laguna P. Self-control and frequency of model presentation: Effects on learning a ballet passé relevé Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(4): 847-56.
17. Abdoli B, Farsi A, Shoja O. The effect of self-controlled observational practice and model’s skill level on badminton long serve. Motor behavior. 2015;20:35-48.
18. Daniel H B. Examining the learning effects of segmented model demonstrations on the motor & cognitive learning of the basketball jump shot [thesis]. [Catharines, Ontario]: Brock University St; 2014.
19. Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. RES Q EXERCISE SPORT.2005;76(1):107-11.
20. Bund A, Wiemeyer J. Self-controlled learning of a complex motor skill: Effects of the learners' preferences on performance and self-efficacy. J Hum Mov Stud. 2004;47(3):215-36.

21. Friedrich HF, Mandl H. Analyse und Förderung selbstgesteuerten lernens [Analysis and support of self-regulated learning]. In: Weinert FE, Mandl H, editors. Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie. I, Bd. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1977. p. 237-95.
22. Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG, Tennant LK, Cauraugh JH. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment RES Q EXERCISE SPORT. 1977;68(4):269-79.
23. Wulf G, Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. RES Q EXERCISE SPORT. 1999;70(3):265-72.
24. Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(2):96-101.
25. Su YL, Reeve J. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23(1):159-88.
26. Guadagnoli MA, Bertram CP. Optimizing practice for performance under pressure. IJGS. 2014;3(2):119-27.
27. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212-24.
28. Andrieux M, Danna J, Thon B. Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2012;83(1):27-35.
29. Breslin G, Hodges NJ, Williams MA. Effect of information load and time on observational learning. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2009;80(3):480-90.
30. Savelsbergh GJP, Van der Kamp J. Information in learning to co-ordinate and control movements: Is there a need for specificity of practice? Int J Sport Psychol. 2000;31(4):467-84.
31. Knudson D. Biomechanics of the basketball jump shot—six key teaching points. JOPERD. 1993;64(2):67-73.
32. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, Kaefer A, Tani G. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2008;79(3):405-10.
33. Post PG, Fairbrother JT, Barros JA. Self-controlled amount of practice benefits learning of a motor skill. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2011;82(3): 474-81.
34. Wu WF, Magill RA. Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Res Q Exercise Sport. 2011;82(3):449-57.
35. Patterson JT, Lee TD. Self-regulated frequency of augmented information in skill learning. Can J Exp Psychol. 2010;64(1):33-40.
36. Hansen S, Pfeiffer J, Patterson J T. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. J Mot Behav. 2011;43(2):113-9.
37. Pintrich PR. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. Int J Educ Res. 1991;31(6):459-70.
38. Zimmerman B J. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educ psychol. 1990;25(1):3-17.
39. Magill RA. Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
40. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. 4th ed. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics Europe Ltd; 2005.