تعداد نشریات | 8 |
تعداد شمارهها | 308 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,860 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,504,609 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,730,180 |
تأثیر تمرین واقعیت مجازی و واقعی با و بدون محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی بر یادگیری مهارت فورهند تنیس روی میز | ||
رفتار حرکتی | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 9، شماره 28، مرداد 1396، صفحه 89-108 اصل مقاله (637.58 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22089/mbj.2017.2633.1320 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مریم لطفی* 1؛ حسن محمدزاده2؛ مهدی سهرابی3 | ||
1دکتری یادگیری حرکتی، دانشگاه ارومیه | ||
2استاد رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه ارومیه | ||
3استاد رفتار حرکتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر تمرین واقعیت مجازی و واقعی با و بدون محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی بر یادگیری مهارت فورهند تنیس روی میز بود. در این پژوهش نیمهتجربی، 48 نفر از دانشجویان دختر دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد (غیر از دانشجویان رشتۀ تربیتبدنی و علوم ورزشی) (با میانگین سنی 99/0±28/20 سال) که مبتدی بودند، بهصورت خوشهای چندمرحلهای انتخاب شده و پس از یک جلسه تمرین و براساس قد، وزن و نمرات اکتسابی در پیشآزمون، در چهار گروه همسان (تمرین واقعی، تمرین واقعی با محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی، تمرین واقعیت مجازی و تمرین واقعیت مجازی با محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی) قرار گرفتند. این افراد طی شش جلسه و در هر جلسه 60 ضربه را تمرین کردند. شایانذکر است که در این پژوهش آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس و آزمون تعقیبی بونفرونی مورداستفاده قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان میدهد که هر چهار گروه در ضربهها پیشرفت داشتهاند که این پیشرفت در اثر تمرین حاصل شده است. همچنین، در مراحل اکتساب و یادداری، گروه تمرین واقعی بدون محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی نسبت به گروه دارای محدودیت، عملکرد بهتری داشته است (P≤0.05) و بین گروههای واقعیت مجازی با و بدون محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی، گروه تمرین واقعی و واقعیت مجازی، گروههای تمرین واقعی و واقعیت مجازی که محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی داشتند و درنهایت، گروه تمرین واقعی با محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی و تمرین واقعیت مجازی اختلاف معناداری مشاهده نمیشود (P≥0.05). بهطورکلی، یافتهها حاکی از آن است که تمرین در محیط واقعیت مجازی بهعنوان یک بازی فعال (احتمالاً) میتواند جایگزین مناسبی برای تمرین واقعی باشد و فرصتهای بهتر یادگیری را فراهم کند. وجود اطلاعات صوتی نیز میتواند برای اجرای حرکت تسهیلکننده باشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
تمرین واقعیت مجازی؛ تمرین واقعی؛ محدودیت اطلاعات صوتی؛ یادگیری؛ فورهند تنیس روی میز | ||
مراجع | ||
1. Schmidt R A, Lee T D. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. 4st ed. United State: Human Kinetics; 2005. P. 122-4.
2. Newell K M, Liu Y T, Mayer-Kress G. Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108 (1): 57-82.
3. Davids K, Button C, Bennett S. Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. 1st ed. Human kinetics, Champaign, Illinois; 2008. P. 20-112.
4. Zanganeh H. Theoretical and practical foundations of educational technology (Vol1). 1st ed. Tehran: Avaye Zohor; 2013. P. 51-5. (In Persian).
5. Gillispie L B. Effects of a 3d video game on middle school student achievement and attitude in mathematics (Master thesis). University of North Carolina Wilmington; 2008.
6. Watson W R. Formative research on an instructional design theory for educational video games (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University; 2007.
7. Kickmeier-Rust D M, Albert D. An alien’s guide to multi-adaptive computer educational games (vol 1). 1 st ed. Santa Rosa: Information Science Press; 2012. P. 10-7.
8. Anetta A L. Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used? New Media and Education in 21st Sentury. Theory into Practice, 2008; 47: 229–39.
9. Anderson M N, Sandra J B. The importanceı ofı playı in early childhoodı development. Family and Human Development (Human Development): MSU Extension. 2010; 4 (10): 95-8. 10. Rostami H R, Arastoo A A, Jahantabi Nejad S, Khayatzadeh Mahany M, Azizi Malamiri R. Comparition of efficacy of combined virtual reality with constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb function of children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. MJTUOMS. 2013; 34 (2): 45-51. (In Persian).
11. Button C. Auditory information and the coordination of one handed catching. In K. David, G. Savelsbergh, S. Bennet, & J. Vander Kamp. (Eds.), Interception actions in sport: Information and movement (P. 184-94). London: Taylor & Francis; 2002.
12. Button C, Davids K. Acoustic information for timing. In H. Hech, & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Time to contact: Advances in psycology (P. 355-70). North- Hpland: Elsevier; 2004.
13. Lee D N. Getting around with light or sound. In R. Warrant, & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self motion (P. 478-505). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990.
14. Keele S W, Summers J J. The structure of motor programs. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends (P. 109-42). New York: Academic Press; 1976.
15. Warren W H, Kim E E, Husney R. The way the ball bounces: Visual and auditory perception of elasticity and control of the bounce pass. Perception and Psychophysics. 1987; 16: 309-36.
16. Schiff W, Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performanc. 1990; 16, 303-16.
17. Rosenblum L D, Carello C, Pastore R E. Relative effectiveness of three stimulus variables for locating a moving sound source. Perception. 1987; 16, 175-86.
18. Danna J, Fontaine M, Paz-Villagrán V, Gondre C, Thoret E, Aramaki M, et al. The effect of real-time auditory feedback on learning new characters. Human Movement Science. 2015; 43: 216-28.
19. Van Vugt F T, Tillmann B. Auditory feedback in error-based learning of motor regularity. Brain Research. 2015; 5(1606): 54-67.
20. Naito Y, Kobayashi T. Effects of kinect sports on health indices of female university students. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2012; 15: 265–327.
21. González C R, Martín-Gutiérrez J, Domínguez M G, HernanPérez A S, Carrodeguas C M. Improving spatial skills: An orienteering experience in real and virtual environments with first year engineering students. Procedia Computer Science. 2013; 25: 428–35.
22. Kim J, Son J, Ko N P T, Yoon B P T. Unsupervised virtual reality-based exercise program improves hip muscle strength and balance control in older adults: A pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2013; 94: 937-43.
23. Patrick J G, Andrea H M. Age differences in the control of a precision reach to grasp task within a desktop virtual environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2014; 72(4): 383–92.
24. Vernadakis N, Papastergiou M, Zetou E, Antoniou P. The impact of an exergame-based intervention on children's fundamental motor skills. Computers & Education. 2015; 83: 90-102.
25. Straker L, Howie E, Abbott R, Smith A. Active video games: Are they an effective approach to reducing sedentary time and increasing physical activity in children? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2014; 18: 23–71.
26. Rostami H R, Arastoo A A, Jahantabi Nejad S, Azizi Malamiri R, Khayatzadeh Mahany M, Goharpey Sh. Efficacy of combined virtual reality with constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb function of children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. JRSS. 2012; 7(4): 499-508. (In Persian).
27. Rostami H R, Jahantabi Nejad S, Arastoo A A. Effects of movement practices in virtual environment on upper limb function of children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy 2012. MRJ. 2012; 5(3): 41-9. (In Persian).
28. Abdoli B, Farsi A, Ekradi M. The effect of behavior exercise and decision in forehand table tennis skills. Olympic Journal. 2012; 19 (4): 25-35. (In Persian).
29. Haibach P, Reid G, Collier D. Motor learning and development. 1st ed. Human Kinetic, Champaign, Ill; Leeds; 2011. P. 13-27.
30. Gallahue D L, Ozmun J C. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults. 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2005. P. 100-21.
31. Söderlund G B, Eckernäs D, Holmblad O, Bergquist F. Acoustic noise improves motor learning in spontaneously hypertensive rats, a rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Brain Research. 2015; 1(280): 84-91.
32. Taub E, Ramey S, DeLuca S, Echols K. Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy for children with cerebral palsy with asymmetric motor impairment. Pediatrics. 2004; 113: 305–12.
33. Nudo R J. Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: Implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2003; 41: 7-10.
34. Adamovich S V, Fluet G G, Tunik E, Merians A S. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: A review. Neurorehabil. 2009; 25: 29-44.
35. Reid D T. Benefits of a virtual play rehabilitation environment for children with cerebral palsy on perceptions of self-efficacy: A pilot study. Pediatr Rehabil. 2002; 5: 141-8.
36. Jang Sh, You Sh, Hallett M, Cho Y W, Park C M, Cho Sh, et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: An experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 2218–23.
37. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang H R, Miltner W H, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000; 31: 1210–6.
38. You Sh, Jang Sh, Kim Y H, Kwon Y H, Barrow I, Hallett M. Cortical reorganization induced by virtual realitytherapy in a child with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47: 628–35.
39. Adamovich S V, Fluet G G, Tunik E, Merians A S. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: A review. Neurorehabil. 2009; 25: 29-44.
40. Plautz E J, Milliken G W, Nudo R J. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: Role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000; 74: 27-55.
41. Alma S, Merians A S, Poizner H, Boian R, Burdea G, Adamovich S. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: Does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20(2): 252-67.
42. Barzegar R, Dehghan Zadeh H, Moghadam Zadeh A. From electronic learning to mobile learning: Theoretical principles. IJVLMS. 2012; 3(2): 35-41. (In Persian).
43. Hashemi M, Ghasemi B. Using mobile phones in language learning/ teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 15: 2947–51.
44. Graham G, Holt-Hale S A, Parker M. Children moving: A reflective approach to teaching physical education. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009. P. 118.
45. Schmidt R A, Lee T D. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2011. P. 53-69.
46. Rink J E. Teaching physical education for learning. 7th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013. P. 145-9.
47. Reich L, Maidenbaum S, Amedi A. The brain as a flexible task machine: Implications for visual rehabilitation using noninvasive vs. invasive approaches. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012; 25 (1): 86–95.
48. Striem-Amit E, Guendelman M, Amedi A. “Visual” acuity of the congenitally blind using visual-to-auditory sensory substitution. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3): 33136.
49. Oscari F, Secoli R, Avanzini F, Rosati G, Reinkensmeyer D J. Substituting auditory for visual feedback to adapt to altered dynamic and kinematic environments during reaching. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 221(1): 33–41.
50. Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, Wolf P. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 20(1): 21–53
51. Altenmuller E, Marco-Pallares J, Mu nte T F, Schneider S. Neural reorganization underlies improvement in stroke-induced motor dysfunction by music-supported therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1169: 395–405.
52. Ronsse R, Puttemans V, Coxon J P, Goble D J, Wagemans J, Wenderoth N, et al. Motor learning with augmented feedback: Modality-dependent behavioral and neural consequences. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 21 (6): 1283–94.
53. Hommel B, Mu¨ sseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(5): 849–78.
54. Shin Y K, Proctor R W, Capaldi E J. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(6): 943–74
55. Edelman G M, Gally J A. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001; 98(24): 13763-8.
56. Jabusch H C, Alpers H, Kopiez R, Vauth H, Altenmu¨ ller E. The influence of practice on the development of motor skills in pianists: A longitudinal study in a selected motor task. Hum Mov Sci. 2009; 28(1): 74–84
57. Van Vugt F T, Altenmu¨ ller E, Jabusch H C. The influence of chronotype on making music: Circadian fluctuations in pianists’ fine motor skills. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013a; 7: 347.
58. Van Vugt F T, Furuya S, Vauth H, Jabusch H C, Altenmu¨ ller E. Playing beautifully when you have to be fast: Spatial and temporal symmetries of movement patterns in skilled piano performance at different tempi. Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(11): 3555–67.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7,702 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 906 |